Sunday, June 8, 2008

Flu Like More Condition_symptoms

Mandates versus the Constitution: Who will win? Why

An article in the November 7, 2006, entitled Why a National Constituent Assembly? , noted that there were no guarantees that the assembly would do that to them they saw fit without thoroughly analyzing the consequences for the Ecuadorian economy in the long term. The weight of the preparation of mandates has been so great that it has delayed the timetable for the Assembly to finalize the new constitution in 180 days and was taken 60 days more to achieve its primary objective. But the assembly still stubborn with the mandates for which I am seriously doubting that meet the deadlines in the statute. What is essential for citizens and for the country or the Constitution mandates? The answer is obvious, but the stupidity is beyond reason. The justification of the mandate is "to help President Correa will fly the country towards sustainable development," then because the economy has grown ridiculously and the tendency of accumulated inflation goes to 10%.
In article of November 30, 2007, entitled THE FULL POWERS: a dictatorship disguised , President Correa indicated that all powers exercised indirectly through the Assembly and not far from reality as the president gives the latest rules the game and accept them but have to endure his anger, his insult and disqualification.
Today, journalist Carlos Vera said in his weekly Zero Tolerance that President Correa is not the owner of the change process but simply the leader and not their assessment is wrong. Several leftist groups that you are removing support for the president this reason and the lack of transparency in several important topics, such as: The case of Angostuta, Dayuma, emergency decrees without control, case Seguros Sucre, etc.
Assemblywoman Maria Paula Romo has stated: "President Correa is the sum of many historical accumulated, but the result of the sum is not a change to the accumulation of wealth but poverty, social divisions and more complex . (Do not forget that wealth is not constant over time). One of the biggest mistakes was not having placed as a condition for being a professional Assemblyman, and so have avoided some delay as the majority of Assembly members have no knowledge of economics, international politics, philosophy, law, history and sciences. It's a shame but the same would happen if I form a board of nuclear physics or dentistry as my contribution would be absolutely null. (I hope the assembly members' salaries are not a perverse incentive for the delay).
Machiavellian vision is that the state is the ultimate end and that end justified any means to achieve it. Central vision is clearer than a year ago and the bill the economy will citizens be high. They refuse to take effective public policy models from other countries that are growing faster than us. There is little time to rectify the assembly and in the short time left to pass laws that Ecuador prosper but the story and the citizens themselves will be his executioners.

0 comments:

Post a Comment